Reported and nailed down by Michale (MeshLogic).
The code that fixes this was commented out, but Brecht gave the go ahead to use it even if it is not the real solution
Create unique flag for output shaders with displacement data and use it
to calculate transformed normal. Implementation suggested by Brecht Van
Lommel.
Reviewers: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D890
Basically the title says it all, volume stack initialization now is aware that
camera might be inside of the volume. This gives quite noticeable render time
regressions in cases camera is in the volume (didn't measure them yet) because
this requires quite a few of ray-casting per camera ray in order to check which
objects we're inside. Not quite sure if this might be optimized.
But the good thing is that we can do quite a good job on detecting whether
camera is outside of any of the volumes and in this case there should be no
time penalty at all (apart from some extra checks during the sync state).
For now we're only doing rather simple AABB checks between the viewplane and
volume objects. This could give some false-positives, but this should be good
starting point.
Need to mention panoramic cameras here, for them it's only check for whether
there are volumes in the scene, which would lead to speed regressions even if
the camera is outside of the volumes. Would need to figure out proper check
for such cameras.
There are still quite a few of TODOs in the code, but the patch is good enough
to start playing around with it checking whether there are some obvious mistakes
somewhere.
Currently the feature is only available in the Experimental feature sey, need
to solve some of the TODOs and look into making things faster before considering
the feature is ready for the official feature set. This would still likely
happen in current release cycle.
Reviewers: brecht, juicyfruit, dingto
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D794
Basically the title says it all, we need to update volume stack when doing ray
scatter for SSS. This leads to speed regressions in cases scene does have both
volume and SSS (performance in case there's no SSS or no volume should be the
same).
We might try optimizing kernel_path_subsurface_update_volume_stack() a bit by
either recording all intersections or using some more appropriate visibility
flags.
Reviewers: brecht, juicyfruit, dingto
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D795
This problem was introduced in 983cbafd18
Basically the issue is that we were not getting a unique index in the
baking routine for the RNG (random number generator).
Reviewers: sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D749
Root of the issue goes back to the on-fly normals commit and the
latest fix for it wasn't actually correct. I've mixed two fixes
in there.
So the idea here goes back to storing negative scaled object flag
and flip runtime-calculated normal if this flag is set, which is
pretty much the same as the original fix for the issue from me.
The issue with motion blur wasn't caused by the rumtime normals
patch and it had issues before, because it already did runtime
normals calculation. Now made it so motion triangles takes the
negative scale flag into account.
This actually makes code more clean imo and avoids rather confusing
flipping code in mesh.cpp.
Now baking does one AA sample at a time, just like final render. There is
also some code for shader antialiasing that solves T40369 but it is disabled
for now because there may be unpredictable side effects.
This reverts commit 12abe94de8.
After a long discussion in the bug tracker we decided baking should use
the faces normals for glossy (and combined). This is what Blender
Internal is doing, and one of the more predictable way of yielding
predictable results.
That also means the result will not match the render perfectly, but this
is preferrable over the alternatives at hand.
Conflicts:
intern/cycles/kernel/kernel_bake.h
Comments from Brecht Van Lommel:
"""
Currently the viewing direction for each pixel is set to the normal, so
at every pixel glossy is evaluated as if you're looking straight at it.
Blender Internal works the same.
"""
This patch makes baking glossy as viewed from the camera.
Reviewers: brecht
CC: zanqdo
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D555
The kernel for baking the world texture was the same as the one used for
baking. Now that's separate which allows the kernel to reserve much less
memory.
If we are using a mix node we still need to evaluate the BSDF lighting
even if scattering is successful.
Note: this was working for branched path (probably an oversight when
branched path support was introduced for baking, a good oversight though
;)
