The test will leak CPU devices, but is all passing other than that.
Leak will be fixed shortly.
P.S. Committing code refactor without running regression tests, tsk ;)
The order was wrong from the semantic point of view, caused
by some legacy workarounds in Libmv. Didn't realize it's was
not how things were expected to be used.
This is also an important mathematical operation that can be folded
if it is known that one argument is a certain constant. For colors
the operation is provided as a Gamma node.
The SVM Gamma node needs a small fix to make it follow the 0 ^ 0 == 1
rule, same as the Power node, or the Gamma node itself in OSL mode.
Reviewers: #cycles
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2263
The if branches were reordered when the original patch was
committed, which broke the implicit non-NULL guarantee on link.
To prevent re-occurrence, add a couple of unit tests.
As a result of other folding simplifications it may happen that
two type conversion nodes end up directly connected. In some
cases it may be possible to then remove both. A realistic case
might be an optimized out Mix RGB node used to blend vectors.
It seems it's safe to optimize when B is a float3 type
(color, vector), and A is float3 or float.
Reviewers: #cycles, sergey
Reviewed By: #cycles, sergey
Subscribers: sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2134
Code coverage of different combinations of secondary conditions
is obviously not complete because there are so many of them, but
all main rules should be there.
The reason for CORRECT vs INVALID is that both words have the same
number of characters so calls line up, but look quite different.
Reviewers: #cycles, sergey
Reviewed By: #cycles, sergey
Subscribers: dingto, sergey, brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2130
This commit adds some easy to use way to check whether the graph
was properly optimized. The idea is based on using mock glog sync
which keeps track on all messages and expects specific log message
to appear in the logging.
This means each optimization step should report that it optimized
something (specifying what exactly was optimized) and what was used
for optimization.
There's also some ease-ish way to define shader networks which we
might want to make a bit more global and available for all tests
in the future.
For now only RGBToBW node is covered as an example, really hope
to get help from active guys in the community to finish covering
all existing optimization cases. Ready to fix any possible issues
with builder when needed tho :)