This commit enables QBVH optimization structure automatically if rendering
with CPU and SSE2 support is detected.
This brings render time of agent shot back to the speed it used to be before
the watertight intersections commit, single koro and sponza scenes are about
7% faster here.
This commit implements traversal for QBVH tree, which is based on the old loop
code for traversal itself and Embree for node intersection.
This commit also does some changes to the loop inspired by Embree:
- Visibility flags are only checked for primitives.
Doing visibility check for every node cost quite reasonable amount of time
and in most cases those checks are true-positive.
Other idea here would be to do visibility checks for leaf nodes only, but
this would need to be investigated further.
- For minimum hair width we extend all the nodes' bounding boxes.
Again doing curve visibility check is quite costly for each of the nodes and
those checks returns truth for most of the hierarchy anyway.
There are number of possible optimization still, but current state is good
enough in terms it makes rendering faster a little bit after recent watertight
commit.
Currently QBVH is only implemented for CPU with SSE2 support at least. All
other devices would need to be supported later (if that'd make sense from
performance point of view).
The code is enabled for compilation in kernel. but blender wouldn't use it
still.
Currently it acts the same as set_cancel(), but this way we're able to
distinguish situations when rendering was aborted by user demand (for
example pressing Esc in standalone renderer) or if something went horribly
wrong (for example out of VRAM error).
This way for example we wouldn't wait a fortune while BVH is building after
GPU run out of memory when loading images just to see the render failure
message.
Forbid OSL from polluting current conext with obscure stuff from
windows.h, it's not useful and unhealthy anyway.
Maybe we sohuld also forbid using abbreviated Glog constants as
well tho.
So now cases when object has both hair motion blur and deformation motion blur
vector pass is all correct.
We could get rid of the flag in the future, still need to look deeper into all
the areas trying to find a more clear solution.
Create unique flag for output shaders with displacement data and use it
to calculate transformed normal. Implementation suggested by Brecht Van
Lommel.
Reviewers: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D890
That code was mainly needed for the transition period, now we've
got all platforms updated to new OSL.
Plus there are some crucial fixes baking in the current upstream
sources which we'll need to have for the next Blender release.
It's the same filter which is used by default by Blender Internal renderer
and it gives crispier edges than gaussian filter.
Default filter for Cycles is unchanged because it's unclear if new filter
gives more noise or not. After some further real production tests we can
consider making Mitchell filter default for Cycles as well.
It is per-material setting which could be found under the Volume settings
in the material and world context buttons.
There could still be some code-wise improvements, like using variable-size
macro for interp3d instead of having interp3d_ex to which you can pass the
interpolation method.
Currently only summed number of traversal steps and intersections used by the
camera ray intersection pass is implemented, but in the future we will support
more debug passes which would help checking what things makes the scene slow.
Example of such extra passes could be number of bounces, time spent on the
shader tree evaluation and so.
Implementation from the Cycles side is pretty much straightforward, could only
mention here that it's a build-time option disabled by default.
From the blender side it's implemented as a PASS_DEBUG with several subtypes
possible. This way we don't need to create an extra DNA pass type for each of
the debug passes, saving us a bits.
Reviewers: campbellbarton
Reviewed By: campbellbarton
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D813
This way there's much less cross-references between objects and meshes
device update functions.
The only thing remained s the object bounds calculation which is needed
by bvh update. This could also be decoupled, but it's not that crucial
yet because its's how it used to be for ages now.
This adds an AABB collision check for objects with volumes and if there's a
collision detected then the object will have SD_OBJECT_INTERSECTS_VOLUME flag.
This solves a speed regression introduced by the fix for T39823 by skipping
volume stack update in cases no volumes intersects the current SSS object.
This means it's no longer needed to enable experimental feature set in order to
have proper camera in volume support. And this also means if there's something
wrong going on, or if there's speed regression for cases when camera is obviously
not in the volume -- this issues are to be reported and handled in the regular
matter.
Happy blending!
The idea is to only count intersections with objects which has volumetric shader
and ignore all other objects.
This is probably as fast as we can go without involving some forth level magic.
Now we do much better preliminary check for panoramic camera is inside the
volume object boundings.
Also we're now cacheing the has_volume in the mesh, which makes it unneeded
iterations for each object's shaders.
Should be no functional changes, just faster sync and panoramic-in-volume
rendering.
Basically the title says it all, volume stack initialization now is aware that
camera might be inside of the volume. This gives quite noticeable render time
regressions in cases camera is in the volume (didn't measure them yet) because
this requires quite a few of ray-casting per camera ray in order to check which
objects we're inside. Not quite sure if this might be optimized.
But the good thing is that we can do quite a good job on detecting whether
camera is outside of any of the volumes and in this case there should be no
time penalty at all (apart from some extra checks during the sync state).
For now we're only doing rather simple AABB checks between the viewplane and
volume objects. This could give some false-positives, but this should be good
starting point.
Need to mention panoramic cameras here, for them it's only check for whether
there are volumes in the scene, which would lead to speed regressions even if
the camera is outside of the volumes. Would need to figure out proper check
for such cameras.
There are still quite a few of TODOs in the code, but the patch is good enough
to start playing around with it checking whether there are some obvious mistakes
somewhere.
Currently the feature is only available in the Experimental feature sey, need
to solve some of the TODOs and look into making things faster before considering
the feature is ready for the official feature set. This would still likely
happen in current release cycle.
Reviewers: brecht, juicyfruit, dingto
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D794
This is rather useful to see how good optimization went and so.
Currently uses quite simple notation: shader nodes are nodes on the
graph, connects between graph nodes are named by the sockets names,
so i.e. connection between BSDF and Mix would be named bsdf:closure1.
Could be improved in the feature to draw fancier graph, but it's good
enough already.
Use in the following way:
- To create graphix file call graph->dump_graph("graph.dot")
- To visualize the grapf call: dot -Tpng graph.dot -o graph.png
tri_shader does no longer need to a float.
Reviewers: dingto, sergey
Reviewed By: dingto, sergey
Subscribers: dingto
Projects: #cycles
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D789
Basically the same as AC2c58e96685e8, but for Mix RGB Shaders, in case we use the Mix type. This way the node can be used as texture switch for example, setting the Factor to 0.0 or 1.0, without wasting extra memory / render time.
I don't see a reason not to do this, and this also fixes update problems when 3D View rendering is running (no volume shader), and then a volume shader gets added.
Thanks for Aldo Zang for the help with the fix for the panorama/fisheye
depth of field calculation and the overall math.
Reviewed By: sergey, dingto
Subscribers: juicyfruit, gregzaal, #cycles, dingto, matray
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D753
