It tried to assert that
addons/io_blend_utils/blender_bam-unpacked.whl/__init__.py was loaded when
the io_blend_utils module was imported. However, this happens only on
demand, and not directly when importing the add-on.
*Sigh* One more example of why we should keep ID management handling in
as few places as possible! It's impossible to keep more than a few
places in sync regarding which ID pointer is refcounted etc.
Children where always getting at least one segment of fixed length...
Now fully hidden ones (zero length) get no segment at all.
Note that even very short ones keep getting one 'unit' length segment - would
rather avoid changing that at this point, given how complex children
particles 'length' can get with all kind of modifiers... Think we can
live with that for now anyway.
The crash did not happen yet because we always had proper vmemh defined in
the parent scope.
Patch by Ivan Ivanov (aka obiwanus), thanks!
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2715
This is not enough to mutex-guard modification code of integer values,
since this operation is NOT atomic. This is not even safe for a single
byte data types.
For now guarded the getter functions, similar to other functions in
this module.
Ideally we want to switch modification to an atomic operations, so we
wouldn't need any locks in the getters.
'Convert To...' Object operation has very weird effect of actually
working at obdata level, not object level, which means *all* objects
(even unselected/hidden/in other scenes/...) using same obdata will be
converted to new selected type.
IMHO this is very bad behavior, but... not a bug really, so do not
change this for now.
But at least, do not do that when working on some linked data, else it
leaves Blend file in invalid (incoherent) state until next reload.
So workaround for now is to enforce the 'Keep Original' option when some
linked object/obdata is affected by the operation.
Also fixed somewhat broken usercount handling in Curve->Mesh part.
That one was probably not an actual issue, except maybe in some corner
cases (like deleting a linked scene also used by some other linked scene).
Again, better not try to do smart & complex freeing logic outside of
BKE_library area, let's keep spaghetti nitghmare in a single place!
Previous code (same as what `BKE_libblock_free_us()` is doing when
usercount reach 0) was probably OK in that specific case, but still not
good idea, and potentially risky.
Even though in that specific it was probably safe-ish, there is no
guarantee at this point Brush we want to remove are not used somewhere,
better take the slightly slower, much safer `BKE_libblock_delete()` path here.
Eeeeeek!^2 Calling unconditionnaly ID freeing `BKE_libblock_free()` on a
datablock (ob->data, i.e. Curve) that may be used elsewhere...
Veryveryvery bad!
*tryed "#" as preprocessor used in POV-Ray for language keywords best behaviour was to have it as a punctuation symbol
*moved "finish" to its proper category
*changed order of some POV-Ray ini files keywords to have them work better
*added a few keywords from latest pov version
*Fixed C-style closing of multiline comments (*/)
Reviewers: campbellbarton, mont29
Reviewed By: campbellbarton, mont29
Subscribers: mont29
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2707
Noisy change, but safe, and better do it sooner than later if we are to
rework copying code. Also, previous commit shows this *is* useful to
catch some mistakes.
